Re: Capture sequencing in logs

And it only kinda works because when there is no question mark then the
field will have the uri instead of being empty...

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Phillip Decker <
pdecker999+haproxy@gmail.com> wrote:

> Funny, yeah I was just playing with it and couldn't get that to work, so I
> just did another git pull thinking maybe I just wasn't updated, then came
> back to my email and saw your second reply.
>
> Hrm. Well, something that seems to sorta work is this (in the log-format
> line):
> %[capture.req.uri,regsub(^.*\?,)]
>
> So, grabbing the full uri and then regex replace everything up to the '?'
> with nothing, but I don't know what kind of underlying impacts that
> approach might have, if any...
>
> Phillip
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Cyril Bonté <cyril.bonte@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> On 31/07/2015 00:14, Cyril Bonté wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Phillip,
>>>
>>> On 31/07/2015 00:05, Phillip Decker wrote:
>>>
>>>> One other log question in this same vein -
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to duplicate the functionality of the %q flag in Apache, and
>>>> I don't see a way in the documentation to print _only_ the query string,
>>>> that is, the information after the question mark in a URI. I see the
>>>> URI without the query (path), the full URI, and looking up specific
>>>> parameters in the URI... am I missing an obvious flag somewhere?
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is only available in 1.6 development branch :
>>> http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.6.html#query
>>>
>>
>> Oops, I replied too quickly, as such HTTP sample fetches are not
>> available in log-format.
>> Maybe we can discuss adding a %HQ (or %HQS) log variable in the future ?
>>
>> --
>> Cyril Bonté
>>
>
>