On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29:53AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> these three patches make sure that there's an explicit dependency from
> the GPIO chip in Tegra SoCs to the corresponding pinctrl device, without
> having duplicated gpio ranges.
>
> By having an explicit dependency, we can do things such as probing the
> pinctrl device before the GPIO chip device to avoid deferred probes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomeu
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled
> - Remove outdated comment from the commit changelog
>
> Tomeu Vizoso (3):
> gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
> pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed
> ARM: tegra: Add gpio-ranges property
Patches 2 and 3 applied to the Tegra tree. Linus, I've applied the
pinctrl patch to a separate branch, so we could use that to resolve
conflicts, should there be any.
Thierry
> Hello,
>
> these three patches make sure that there's an explicit dependency from
> the GPIO chip in Tegra SoCs to the corresponding pinctrl device, without
> having duplicated gpio ranges.
>
> By having an explicit dependency, we can do things such as probing the
> pinctrl device before the GPIO chip device to avoid deferred probes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomeu
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled
> - Remove outdated comment from the commit changelog
>
> Tomeu Vizoso (3):
> gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
> pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed
> ARM: tegra: Add gpio-ranges property
Patches 2 and 3 applied to the Tegra tree. Linus, I've applied the
pinctrl patch to a separate branch, so we could use that to resolve
conflicts, should there be any.
Thierry
