On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrote:
> If that's what it will take I will happily draft one tomorrow morning. But
> if the RMs are against it, I will respect that as well. Hence the dilemma.
For what I understand the RMs are not against what it is proposed but
its incompleteness and the fact that it affects the timeline for php
7.
The sooner will benefit from a RFC, making this whole discussion a lot
clearer. The latter is a requirement to change, even slightly,
anything about what we decided for php 7. The RMs role is to ensure we
respect what we decided by RFC, hence the oppositions.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> If that's what it will take I will happily draft one tomorrow morning. But
> if the RMs are against it, I will respect that as well. Hence the dilemma.
For what I understand the RMs are not against what it is proposed but
its incompleteness and the fact that it affects the timeline for php
7.
The sooner will benefit from a RFC, making this whole discussion a lot
clearer. The latter is a requirement to change, even slightly,
anything about what we decided for php 7. The RMs role is to ensure we
respect what we decided by RFC, hence the oppositions.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php