Hi Sergei,
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 00:24 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 09/07/2015 11:50 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>
> > Current implementation via IS_ERR(phydev) may make no sense because
> > of_phy_attach() returns NULL on failure instead of error value.
>
> Not of_phy_connect()?
I already noticed this misspelling - it came from my exploration of
what happens inside of_phy_connect(). So sort of braindump.
I will fix in v3 re-spin.
-Alexey--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 00:24 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 09/07/2015 11:50 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>
> > Current implementation via IS_ERR(phydev) may make no sense because
> > of_phy_attach() returns NULL on failure instead of error value.
>
> Not of_phy_connect()?
I already noticed this misspelling - it came from my exploration of
what happens inside of_phy_connect(). So sort of braindump.
I will fix in v3 re-spin.
-Alexey--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/