> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/daqboard2000.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/daqboard2000.c
> @@ -713,12 +713,8 @@ static int daqboard2000_auto_attach(struct comedi_device *dev,
> return result;
>
> s = &dev->subdevices[2];
> - result = subdev_8255_init(dev, s, daqboard2000_8255_cb,
> - dioP2ExpansionIO8Bit);
> - if (result)
> - return result;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return subdev_8255_init(dev, s, daqboard2000_8255_cb,
> + dioP2ExpansionIO8Bit);
> }
What do you think about horizontally aligning the parameters in the second line?
They were previously.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/daqboard2000.c
> @@ -713,12 +713,8 @@ static int daqboard2000_auto_attach(struct comedi_device *dev,
> return result;
>
> s = &dev->subdevices[2];
> - result = subdev_8255_init(dev, s, daqboard2000_8255_cb,
> - dioP2ExpansionIO8Bit);
> - if (result)
> - return result;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return subdev_8255_init(dev, s, daqboard2000_8255_cb,
> + dioP2ExpansionIO8Bit);
> }
What do you think about horizontally aligning the parameters in the second line?
They were previously.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/