On 06/10, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Currently it is not made explicit why clk_fixed_set_rate() can ignore
> its arguments and unconditionally return success. Add a comment
> to explain this.
>
> We also mark the clk_ops table const since it should never be
> modified at runtime.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> Currently it is not made explicit why clk_fixed_set_rate() can ignore
> its arguments and unconditionally return success. Add a comment
> to explain this.
>
> We also mark the clk_ops table const since it should never be
> modified at runtime.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
